Resources

Burst Billing vs GeriPro: SNF Part B Billing Models Compared

A criteria-based comparison of two approaches to Medicare Part B supply billing in skilled nursing facilities. Burst Billing publishes this page and has an obvious interest in the outcome, so the comparison is limited to criteria a facility can verify independently, and it states what we do not know.

How to read this comparison

  • The useful distinction is the billing model, not the brand: whether a vendor bills under your facility's NPI or under its own supplier NPI.
  • We describe Burst Billing's model from our own service terms. We do not publish specific fees, contract terms, or service details for GeriPro, because we have no independently verified source for them.
  • Ask any vendor, including us, the same list of questions below and compare the written answers.
  • Nothing here should be read as a claim that one provider is better. Fit depends on your census, your supply categories, and your existing contracts.

Last updated August 2026

Methodology and limitations

This page compares billing models using criteria a facility can confirm in writing from any vendor. Statements about Burst Billing come from our own service terms. Statements about any other company are deliberately limited to what that company publishes publicly, and where we have no verified source we say so instead of estimating. Reviewed August 2026. If you represent GeriPro and want a detail corrected or added, contact us and we will update this page with the source noted.

The two models a facility is actually choosing between

In the independent billing partner model, the facility remains the billing entity: claims go out under the facility's own institutional NPI, against the facility's own clinical record, and the reimbursement lands with the facility. In the supplier-plus-billing model, a supplier both provides the product and bills Medicare under its own NPI, and the reimbursement lands with the supplier. Both models exist legitimately. They produce very different revenue, documentation, and control outcomes for the facility.

What Burst Billing does

Burst Billing is an independent Part B supply billing partner for skilled nursing facilities. We do not sell supplies. Claims are billed under the facility's own institutional NPI, sourced from the facility's clinical documentation, with a read-only PointClickCare workflow so clinical staff are not doing duplicate entry. Our pricing is contingency-based, so there is no upfront billing fee. We do not bill Durable Medical Equipment under a facility's institutional NPI.

What we can and cannot say about GeriPro

GeriPro is one of several companies operating in SNF Part B supply billing. We do not have independently verified, dated information about its current fee structure, contract terms, integration scope, or geographic coverage, so this page does not state any. Treat any comparison table on any vendor's website, including ours, as a starting point for questions rather than as verified fact about a competitor.

Questions to ask both vendors in writing

Whose NPI is on the claim? Who receives the reimbursement? Do you also sell the supplies you bill for? Which supply categories do you handle, and which do you exclude? How does your workflow read our clinical documentation, and does it create duplicate entry for nursing staff? Who assembles the claim file if we are reviewed? How is your fee calculated, and is there any charge if nothing is recovered? What is the term and the exit notice period? Compare the written answers side by side.

Get Burst Billing's answers in writing

Independent billing partner vs. supplier-plus-billing

What matters
Independent billing partner (Burst Billing)
Supplier-plus-billing model
Claim submitted under facility's institutional NPI
Yes
No, supplier's own NPI
Reimbursement paid to the facility
Yes
No, paid to the supplier
Sells the supplies it bills for
No
Yes
Documentation sourced from facility's own chart
Yes
Varies by vendor
Facility controls its supply vendor relationships
Yes
Typically tied to the supplier
Fee model
Contingency on recovered reimbursement
Built into product pricing, varies

Related

Frequently asked questions

  • This page does not make that claim. Burst Billing publishes it, so it is not an independent review. The comparison is between two billing models, and the right choice depends on your census, your supply categories, and your existing supplier contracts. Ask both companies the same written questions and compare their answers.
From the blog

Related insights

All articles
Reclaim Revenue You're Entitled To

Turn Missed Opportunities Into Real Profit.

Request a Part B reimbursement review for your skilled nursing facility. No added work for your staff. No upfront cost. No obligation.

"*" indicates required fields

Risk-free. If you don't get paid, neither do we.

We never share your information. No PHI submitted through this form.

Burst Billing publishes this comparison and is one of the companies described, so it is not an independent review. Company names and trademarks referenced belong to their respective owners, and no affiliation or endorsement is implied. Details about other companies are limited to publicly available information and may change; verify current terms directly with each vendor. Reviewed August 2026.