How to Audit Your SNF's Part B Supply Vendor Arrangement
Most skilled nursing facilities inherited their Part B supply arrangement rather than chose it. A supply vendor delivers dressings, ostomy, urological, tracheostomy, and splint or orthotic products, handles the paperwork, and the facility rarely sees a claim, a remittance, or a denial. That arrangement can be entirely appropriate. The problem is that many facilities cannot tell, because they have never looked.
This is a five-step internal review you can run with your existing team. It does not assume your vendor is doing anything wrong. It establishes what is actually being billed, under whose number, against what documentation, and whether the arrangement matches the Medicare rules that apply to your residents.
Step 1: Establish What Is Being Billed and By Whom
Start with facts, not assumptions. Before you can evaluate the arrangement, you need to see the claim record behind it. Request the following from your supply vendor in writing, identifying the contract, compliance, or reconciliation purpose of the request:
- HCPCS codes billed for your residents, by date of service
- The billing NPI submitted on those claims
- Claim status, allowed amounts, and paid amounts
- Denials, adjustments, and any recoupments
- The Medicare contractor the claims were submitted to
Data sharing is subject to privacy and authorization requirements, so expect the vendor to scope what it releases. If the vendor declines entirely, document the request and the response. A refusal to disclose billing activity conducted in connection with your residents is itself an audit finding worth escalating to your compliance officer.
In parallel, pull your own side of the record. Understanding how Medicare Part B supply billing works will tell you which of your residents fall outside a covered Part A stay and therefore generate Part B supply activity at all.
Step 2: Read the Contract, Line by Line
Vendor supply agreements are often signed by operations and never reviewed by billing or compliance. Pull the executed agreement, every amendment, and any business associate agreement attached to it. Have your compliance officer and counsel look specifically at these provisions.
| Contract provision | What to check |
|---|---|
| Exclusivity | Whether the facility is restricted from billing or contracting for the same item categories |
| Claim submission | Which entity submits claims, under which NPI, and to which contractor |
| Compensation | Fee structure, contingency percentages, rebates, and product pricing tied to billing rights |
| Documentation duties | Who is responsible for orders, medical necessity records, and proof of delivery |
| Records access | Whether the facility can obtain claim and payment data on request |
| Audit cooperation | Who responds to a MAC, RAC, or ZPIC request, and who bears repayment |
| Term and termination | Notice period, auto-renewal dates, and exit obligations |
Flag any language that appears to assign claim rights, payment rights, or resident benefits to the supplier, and confirm with counsel that the agreement does not conflict with applicable Medicare rules.
Step 3: Test the Documentation Trail
Pick a sample of recent supply months and trace individual items from the chart to the claim. For each sampled item, confirm that the record contains a signed physician order, medical necessity documentation tied to the resident's condition, and proof that the item was delivered and used. These are the same documentation requirements a Medicare contractor would apply on review.
Two questions matter more than the rest. First, does the documentation live in your system, or only in the vendor's? If a contractor requests records and the facility cannot produce them independently, the facility is exposed regardless of who submitted the claim. Second, do the dates of service in the claim data line up with the MAR and the resident's stay status in your census?
Step 4: Check the Arrangement Against the Medicare Rules
This is where most arrangements either hold up or do not. CMS guidance on SNF consolidated billing states that items and services subject to consolidated billing during a covered Part A stay generally must be billed by the SNF, either directly or under an arrangement with an outside supplier. Separate rules apply to certain items and to SNF outpatients and Part B residents.
Work through your sample resident by resident:
- Determine the resident's status on the date of service: covered Part A stay, non-covered day, Part B only, or Medicare Advantage.
- Identify the HCPCS code and confirm whether it falls within consolidated billing for that status.
- Confirm which entity submitted the claim and to which contractor.
- Compare that to the rule applicable to the item, the payer, and the date of service.
- Escalate any mismatch to compliance before drawing conclusions or contacting the vendor.
If your review shows supplies billed separately by a supplier during covered Part A stays, treat that as a compliance question rather than a billing preference. Facilities that want to remove the ambiguity often move to billing under your own NPI, which keeps the claim, the documentation, and the audit response in one place.
Step 5: Evaluate the Transition Economics Before Deciding
An audit finding is not automatically a reason to change vendors. Once you know what is being billed and whether the arrangement is defensible, weigh the practical variables: contract notice periods, enrollment and payer requirements, documentation readiness, EHR workflow, the item and HCPCS mix in your building, and the staff time implementation would take.
There is no universal timeline for moving from supplier billing to facility billing. Burst has seen selected PointClickCare integration implementations reach a first claim in under two weeks. That is an observation from specific facilities, not a guarantee or an industry benchmark.
What to Do With the Findings
Document the review, the requests you made, what you received, and what you could not obtain. Share the findings with your compliance committee. If the arrangement is sound, you now have a record showing you checked. If it is not, you have the evidence needed to renegotiate, escalate, or transition on an informed basis.
Burst Billing works exclusively with skilled nursing facilities on Medicare Part B supply billing, billing under the facility's own NPI on a contingency basis. If you want a second set of eyes on what your claim record shows, the assessment is free, takes 30 minutes, and ends with written findings.
Compliance Note
This is not legal advice. Medicare billing should be validated against current contractor instructions and reviewed by qualified compliance or legal professionals before implementation.
References

Written by
Eric Hansen
Founder, Burst Billing
Eric Hansen is the founder of Burst Billing. He has spent over a decade helping skilled nursing facilities recover missed Medicare Part B supply reimbursement through cleaner documentation, tighter vendor workflows, and risk-free billing reviews.
More from Eric →Frequently asked questions
- Sometimes, depending on the resident's status, the item, the date of service, and the applicable Medicare billing rules. CMS guidance states that items and services subject to SNF consolidated billing during a covered Part A stay generally must be billed by the SNF, either directly or under an arrangement with an outside supplier. CMS also describes separate billing rules for certain items and for SNF outpatients or Part B residents. The facility should verify the HCPCS code and beneficiary status with the applicable Medicare contractor before billing.
- Request it formally in writing and identify the contract, authorization, compliance, reconciliation, or transition purpose. Ask for HCPCS codes, dates of service, claim status, allowed and paid amounts, denials, adjustments, and recoupments, subject to privacy and authorization requirements. If the supplier does not provide the information, document the request and review the contract and escalation options with counsel or the compliance officer.
- A Local Coverage Determination is one type of Medicare contractor coverage guidance. An LCD can specify coverage requirements, documentation, and medical-necessity criteria for particular items or services. The applicable rules may also come from a National Coverage Determination, the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, DME MAC guidance, or other Medicare authorities. Claims should be evaluated against the rules applicable to the item, payer, and date of service.
- Look at exclusivity and exit provisions, claim-submission and payment language, compensation and contingency fees, documentation responsibilities, audit cooperation, records access, termination, and auto-renewal. Have the compliance officer and counsel review provisions that appear to assign claim rights, payment rights, or resident benefits to the supplier, and confirm that the contract does not conflict with Medicare rules.
- There is no universal timeline. Key variables include contract notice periods, payer and enrollment requirements, resident-status rules, documentation readiness, EHR workflow, item and HCPCS mix, and implementation resources. Burst reports that selected PointClickCare-integrated implementations have reached a first claim in under two weeks. That observation should not be treated as a guarantee or a general industry standard.
- CMS uses CRUSH, or Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare, as a broad fraud, waste, abuse, and improper-payment prevention initiative. CMS describes it as a framework for considering ways to prevent, detect, and respond to suspicious activity across Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and Marketplace programs. It is relevant context for compliance discussions but does not establish that a particular SNF vendor arrangement is improper.
Continue exploring
See what your facility may be missing
No upfront cost · No recovery, no fee
